Woodland Hills
CA
| IRS ruling year:
1995
| EIN:
95
-
4310830
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
Organization Mission
The Celiac Disease Foundation, established in 1990, is a leading global patient advocacy organization committed to accelerating diagnosis, treatments, and a cure for... (More)
Rating Information
Great
This charity's score is 100%, earning it a
Four-Star
rating.
If this organization aligns with your passions and values, you can give with confidence.
This overall score is calculated
from multiple beacon scores
, weighted as follows:51% Accountability & Finance, 24% Impact & Measurement, 10% Leadership & Adaptability, 15% Culture & Community. Learn more about our criteria and methodology.
Historical Ratings
Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Measurement. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our
Rating histories are available for a growing number of rated organizations. Check back later to see if this organization has a rating history!
Rating Report
Impact & Measurement
Score
99
This beacon estimates the actual impact a charity has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.
Assessments
Impact
Unscored
0%
of
Impact & Measurement
score
- Agree, uses information collected to improve programs
- Agree, staff have experience working with monitoring and evaluation practices
- Agree, documents and reviews
- Review of academic research
- Consulted other nonprofits
- Referred to the practices of similar nonprofits
- Referred to the practices of government programs
- Referred to relevant private-sector practices
- Surveyed target population
- Assessed ethical and legal compliance
- Agree, does revisit how program activities lead to change
- Tracks activities
- Tracks outcomes and impacts
- Tracks using timelines and milestones
- Aligns plan with mission
- Consulted other nonprofits
- Reviewed data from prior monitoring and/or evaluation
- Conducted a literature review
- Conducted interviews and/or focus groups
- Conducted a needs assessment
- Agree, charity is responsive to practical, cultural, and political needs
- Agree, reviews the work of similar organizations
- Agree, identified Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound (SMART) goals
- Collects data before a program is initiated
- Collects data during program implementation
- Collects data when a program is complete
- Identifies the number of those served by program
- Collects demographic data of those served by program
- Collects information about the quality of service from the target population
- Generates summary statistics of key metrics
- Compares results to data from major institutions
- Conducts data analysis over multiple points in time to measure change over time
- Compares programs results to programs that work on the same issues
- Compares program results to different types of programs in the geographic area
- Funders
- Staff and volunteers
- Board members
- Participants/beneficiaries of our work
- Other organizations engaged in similar work
- Findings are publicly available
- Yes, charity reports both favorable of unfavorable results
- Sustain and secure funding
- Inform strategic planning
- Improve program operations
- Understand the impact of their work
- Inform how we create future programs
Measurement
99 out of 100 points
100%
of
Impact & Measurement
score
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
The Measuring Outcomes assessment evaluates how well a charity tracks progress towards its mission's outcomes.
Displayed below are the responses provided by the charity for the Measuring Outcomes assessment. Each question is designed to address specific criteria, with responses eligible for full, partial, or no credit. Please refer to the
for details on how responses are scored.
Selected program:
iCureCeliac Patient Registry
Program Planning and Design
29 out of 29 points
This section assesses the use of crucial evaluation tools in program objective-setting and activities.
Charity leadership uses information collected to make decisions regarding programs
Charity staff have training or experience in monitoring and evaluation
Charity has documents and reviews how program activities lead to change
Charity has researched program model before implementation in the following ways
Charity revisits how program activities lead to change
Charity tracks program progress in the following ways
Program Development
26 out of 26 points
This section assesses the consideration of stakeholders in program objectives and activities.
Charity identifies program target population needs in the following ways
Charity considers practical, cultural, and political needs and interests of those served by program
Charity reviews the work whether similar organizations work on the same problem
Charity uses SMART Goals
Data Collection and Analysis
16 out of 18 points
This section assesses the best practices used in collecting and analyzing program data.
Charity tracks program information in the following ways
Charity collects programmatic information on those served by the program in the following ways
Charity collects and analyzes program information to determine results in the following ways
Reporting and Distribution of Results
18 out of 18 points
This section assesses reporting and disseminating program results.
Charity reports program results to key stakeholders
Charity reports both favorable and unfavorable results
Use of Results
9 out of 9 points
This section assesses the use of results to guide learning.
Charity uses program results to inform future work for the following reasons